Monday, April 27, 2015

the dialogue of thought

"Aristotle, speaking of friendship, remarked: 'the friend is another self'—meaning: you can carry on the dialogue of thought with him just as well as with yourself. This is still in the Socratic tradition, except that Socrates would have said: The self, too, is a kind of friend...The common point, however, is that the dialogue of thought can be carried out only among friends, and its basic criterion, its supreme law, as it were, says: Do not contradict yourself."

—Hannah Arendt, The Life of the Mind

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

a grammatical lament

As I mentioned in my last post, I have a problem with semi-colons and colons. This realization didn't just come to me out of the blue, though. I've been feeling ashamed of myself because I've been reading Confessions of a Comma Queen by Mary Norris, who is a long-time proofreader at The New Yorker. There are parts of this book that are laugh-out-loud funny, which I was not at all expecting in a book about grammar. Titles of chapters include, "Comma Comma Comma Comma, Chameleon" and "F*ck This Sh*t." Here is a sample insight, from my favorite chapter, which is on dashes, semicolons and colons:
Americans can do without the semicolon, just as they can give Marmite a pass...We are a plainspoken, cheerfully vulgar people. Which is not to say that Mark Twain couldn't or didn't use semicolons--only that Huck Finn would find them fancy.
On this particularly point I must quarrel with you, Mary. If you read my dissertation, you would know that this particular American loves semicolons (and colons, too!). Marmite I'm not so keen on, but semicolons are delicious. Perhaps I like them precisely because Huck Finn would find them fancy?

This problem I have with grammar goes back a long, long time. In fact, the only test I ever failed was an 8th grade English exam on grammar. (I got a D, actually, which was basically as low as you could go in my supportive and very expensive private middle school.) I was mostly indignant about this failure--I thought my teacher was an idiot. Not an idiot overall, because otherwise I rather liked him, but I thought that anyone who actually expected me to know this arbitrary grammatical nonsense had no common sense. I got As on most of my papers, so why did I need to know about direct and indirect clauses, or the proper use of the subjective case?

I went home complaining about the idiocy of my English teacher, and I expected some sympathy, since my mother had instructed me on more than one occasion to ignore my teachers if I thought they were being stupid. In this instance, though, she surprised me by insisting that to be a good writer I would need to know proper grammar. And then she sat me down and began diagramming sentences and explaining various types of predicates.

As it stands, and despite my mother's efforts, I have a blunderers knowledge of grammar--if it sounds right to me, I just go with it. And whenever my mother reads something I've written, she invariably points out all of the infinitives I've split along the way. I sent my mother a copy of my dissertation months ago and I'm secretly hoping she never reads it. If she does, she'll be horrified. Mary Norris would be too.

Throughout her book, Norris mentions certain New Yorker writers with immaculate prose and she hints about those who needed a lot of help. Learning that some authors published in The New Yorker actually needed help gave me a twinge of hope. I'm not necessarily doomed. I just need to find someone who enjoys diagramming sentences--but do they even teach that in school anymore?

Friday, April 3, 2015

a smorgasbord

It's been a while. Some things have happened.

1. I got a job! I started on Wednesday! I don't think blogging about work is ever a great idea, so I will just say this: the promise of a decent paycheck is a beautiful and wonderful thing. 

2. I re-read the beginning of my dissertation the other day, for reasons totally unclear to me now. I do not recommend the experience. The content is pretty ok, but I went totally nuts on the colons and semi-colons. I want to use them all the time (see the previous paragraph for evidence!) and I just can't stop. Yes, my name is Julia, and I am a (semi-)colon addict.* I need to go to punctuation rehab. Surely the Chicago Manual of Style runs such an establishment?

3. I enjoyed this essay a great deal. I'm not very hip to the whole evolution debate, so this was an eye-opener. And his reflections on teaching are wonderful.
The thing about teaching is we are never sure we are making a difference. We never know how many students have been reached. What I have never come to grips with is that no matter how hard I try to be the best teacher I can, I will fail to connect with some students.
4. And this is another excellent essay. (Yes, work has been slow today.) I don't know much about Terry Eagleton, but the free will vs. neurology question has bugged me for a long time. (There was a particularly freaky RadioLab on the topic a while back, too.) Eagleton distills the salient points of the issue in a way that is eye-opening. I was going to quote from the essay, but I liked so many parts of it I couldn't choose just one. You should really just go read it!

*Incidentally, how is it that a part of the human anatomy and a punctuation mark go by the same name? The colon in my body looks nothing like the colon in my writing. I need to find the etymology on this.