Sometime around 2018, I stopped reading the news. This was kind of a big deal, because I was raised in a family where not reading the news is a kind of heresy. Being informed was our version of being godly. I am amazed to remember that not very long ago I had the Sunday New York Times delivered in print (!) to my house.
My father always told me that his father, who is credited with getting the family out of Germany, read the newspaper every day. Being informed about the Nazis gave him insight others didn't have, I was told. Reading the newspaper could save your life.
This is not true, of course. No amount of newspaper reading could have saved my grandfather's life, especially since newspapers in Germany in the late 1930s were not reporting the news. What saved my grandfather's life was that he married my grandmother, and she had a distant cousin living in Ohio. That cousin talked the Fleischmann family (of margarine riches) into sponsoring my grandparents. They left Germany in August 1939, less than a month before the invasion of Poland. No one else on either side of the family survived.
I have no doubt my grandfather enjoyed reading the paper — he had three kids and got up at 4am every day to bake bread. Thirty minutes of quiet reading time every day was probably lovely. (I'm guessing. He died many years before I was born.)
Anyway, while my Opa John may have disapproved, I've been a lot happier since I stopped reading the news. It's been very freeing. The best part is when anyone tries to engage me on some topic of current events or policy, I can quite honestly say that I don't know much about it. People sometimes bloviate past this statement but in general my sheer ignorance on, say, the rate of immigration, takes the wind out of their sails.
I'm surprised at how much I haven't missed, honestly. I read articles people occasionally send me and Josh tells me breaking news, like when Trump got shot. I've never felt embarrassingly uninformed in polite company, though I did only recently learn who was running for Senate in my state.
Though, come to think of it, I do now read the hyper parochial news religiously. I am extremely well informed on the 10th anniversary of a nearby crepe restaurant and the contentious local effort to turn a caution sign at a busy crosswalk into a traffic signal (the township wants it, the borough does not!). I find this kind of news extremely useful. I knew that a Cava was opening near me at least 2 months before anyone else. This is the kind of news I can use.
5 comments:
It is extremely important to be apprised of Cava-related news, I agree.
I read the newspaper, but not exactly the news. This was never a conscious decision though, I just find horserace politics boring, and since COVID, I’m not actually sure what news is. Like the front page of the NYT consists of lots of articles but are they news? It was news when Israel pager-bombed all the Hezbollah members, but “Israel continues to bomb various parts of Gaza and Lebanon” is a new article that says the same thing every day. Or there is the news that isn’t news that’s like, did you know that Trump cheated on his taxes even more than we thought the last time we reported that he cheated on his taxes? I’ve just become cynical about the value of all this.
Also, for several weeks in August, the “news” on the NYT homepage was literally that the Harris campaign was engendering mass joy. So much joy. This delegate was joyous, and these supporters were joyous, and just joy was coursing through the streets of Chicago. NEWS.
But, I do love the NYT Spelling Bee game.
We still get a print Post every day and the Sunday Times. I do read it, but only what I want. I can't listen to news on tv or radio (or podcasts) but I can read/skip what I want in a very passive way, and I love it. I'll be so sad when they eventually stop printing newspapers.
MSI: Yes, I am pretty much in the same boat. I don't know what news is anymore, either. I still read the real estate section of the NYTimes, but that's not news! I think I used to keep up on the details of military campaigns and be much more interested in minutiae of political races. I remember reading 538 during election season, now you couldn't pay me to read it. I am not so much cynical as uninterested, maybe?
Alex: I remember you used to get the print paper! I do sometimes think that having an object to read, something I could hold in my hand, might bring some of the enjoyment back. For your sake, I hope they never stop printing the paper.
Having paper copies lying around also makes it easier to pick up something to read in 45 second increments, when I have breaks from the otherwise ceaseless demands of my children, without pulling out my phone all the time.
Post a Comment